ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2024
Assessing the Accuracy of Reporting of Hypertension on Death Certificates in Australia.
Article in American journal of hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Growing Mortality Divide: Demographic and Regional Disparities in Cirrhosis With Renal Failure, U.S. 1999-2023.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- A Growing mortality divide: demographic and regional disparities in thromboembolism with hypertension, U.S. 1999-2023.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- The role of cardiovascular risk factors on educational and regional inequalities in mortality in Spain 2016-2022: An analysis using multiple causes of death.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- Mortality Due to Aortic Dissection in Adults With Primary Hypertension: A Nationwide Analysis Over Two Decades.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Leading Causes of Death Among US Adults With and Without Hypertension: Data From the REGARDS Study.American journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease From 1999 to 2020: A Retrospective Study in the United States.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is insufficient evidence of how accurately hypertension is reported on death certificates, which are the primary evidence of causes of death. This study assesses the accuracy of reporting of hypertension on death certificates of decedents in Australia who previously had their blood pressure measured.
methodsBlood pressure data from the 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 National Health Surveys were linked to death registration data from July 2015 to December 2021 (average 3.3 years from survey to death). The percentage of decedents with hypertension reported on the death certificate was calculated according to blood pressure level and previous diagnosis of hypertension.
resultsHypertension was reported on the death certificate of 20.2% (95% confidence interval 12.1%-28.3%) of decedents who had very high to severe blood pressure (160/100 mm Hg and above), 14.5% (10.3%-18.8%) who had high blood pressure (140 to <160 / 90 to <100 mm Hg), 14.1% (10.8%-17.4%) who had normal to high blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) and who took hypertension medication, and 17.8% (13.6%-22.0%) who had been diagnosed with hypertension. Where the decedent had very high to severe blood pressure, hypertension was reported for 27.9% (14.1%-41.8%) of deaths if they had been diagnosed with hypertension, and 21.7% (9.6%-33.7%) where another cardiovascular disease was reported on the death certificate.
conclusionsHypertension mortality in Australia is only reported for a minority of deaths of people with high or very high to severe blood pressure; this is also found for those with a prior diagnosis of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.