Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135398›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part A2024

Mapping Biomaterial Complexity by Machine Learning.

Eman Ahmed, Prajakatta Mulay, Cesar Ramirez, Gabriela Tirado-Mansilla, Eugene Cheong, Adam J Gormley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Automated active learning to optimize hydrogel drug release profiles.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Toward Sex-Specific Biomaterials Innovation: A Perspective.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eman AhmedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Prajakatta MulayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Cesar RamirezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Gabriela Tirado-MansillaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Eugene CheongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Adam J GormleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2884-725X

Funding

Rutgers Biotechnology Training ProgramT32GM135141 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI ANN M. STOCK, Martin L Yarmush · 2020 to 2026
$3.5M
IMSD at Rutgers - New Brunswick (Renewal)T32GM139804 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Brian Daniels, JAMES H. MILLONIG · 2021 to 2026
$2.9M
Tuning multivalency for optimized ligand presentationR35GM138296 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI GORMLEY, ADAM JOSEPH · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138296NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135141NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials often have subtle properties that ultimately drive their bespoke performance. Given this nuanced structure-function behavior, the standard scientific approach of one experiment at a time or design of experiment methods is largely inefficient for the discovery of complex biomaterials. More recently, high-throughput experimentation coupled with machine learning methods has matured beyond expert users allowing scientists and engineers from diverse backgrounds to access these powerful data science tools. As a result, we now have the opportunity to strategically utilize all available data from high-throughput experiments to train efficacious models and map the structure-function behavior of biomaterials for their discovery. Herein, we discuss this necessary shift to data-driven determination of structure-function properties of biomaterials as we highlight how machine learning is leveraged in identifying physicochemical cues for biomaterials in tissue engineering, gene delivery, drug delivery, protein stabilization, and antifouling materials. We also discuss data-mining approaches that are coupled with machine learning to map biomaterial functions that reduce the load on experimental approaches for faster biomaterial discovery. Ultimately, harnessing the prowess of machine learning will lead to accelerated discovery and development of optimal biomaterial designs.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsMachine LearningAnimalsHumansTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterialsdata mininghigh-throughput experimentationmachine learningstructure–property relationshipstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39135398
PMCPMC12394815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.