Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135197›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Development and validation of a rating scale for barriers to and facilitators of nurses' participation intentions in "Internet + Nursing Service".

Fei Tian, Zhekang Peng, Yuanyuan Mi, Shengmin Gui, Min Liu, Ting Zhang, Jinglan Liu, Xingguang Qu, Zhaohui Zhang, Zuyang Xi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fei Tian *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 433000, China.
Zhekang Peng *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 433000, China.
Yuanyuan Mi *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Shengmin GuiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 433000, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 433000, China.
Ting ZhangCollege Medical, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China.
Jinglan LiuDepartment of Nursing, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China.
Xingguang QuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 433000, China.
Zhaohui ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 433000, China. 1410956890@qq.com.
Zuyang XiDepartment of Nursing, The First Clinical Medicine College of China Three Gorges University, Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China. 297242464@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven increases in China's aging population, the growing demand for public health services and the shortage of human resources among nurses have become more prominent. Under such a background, "Internet + Nursing Services" have received more attention. Thus, exploring the barriers to and facilitators of nurses' willingness to participate in "Internet + Nursing Services" and utilizing internet technology to increase the supply of nursing services has become a key issue.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a scale for assessing the barriers to and facilitators of nurses' willingness to participate in "Internet + Nursing Services" and to test the validity and reliability of the scale.

methodsA preliminary scale was developed based on a literature review, theoretical research, semistructured qualitative interviews, and two rounds of Delphi expert inquiry. A convenient sampling method was used for the questionnaire survey. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the importance of the items. The survey data of 659 clinical nurses obtained from February to March 2023 were used for item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability and validity tests of the scale. The survey data of 538 clinical nurses obtained in April 2023 were used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the final scale.

resultsThe final scale consists of 25 items and 4 dimensions (performance expectations, perceived risk, need for professional knowledge training, and nonprofessional knowledge training). The scale showed good structural validity and content validity: the Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.955, the split-half reliability was 0.778, the test-retest reliability was 0.944, the kaiser-meyer-olkin(KMO) value was 0.960, and the cumulative variance contribution rate of the 4 common factors was 83.147%. The scale content validity index(S-CVI) was 0.914. The confirmatory factor analysis model had favorable fit indices: χ

conclusionThe scale for assessing the barriers to and facilitators of nurses' willingness to participate in "Internet + Nursing Services" has good reliability and validity, and provides a reference for evaluating nurses' willingness to participate in "Internet + Nursing Services".

Indexed as

Confirmatory factor analysisExploratory factor analysisInternet + nursing servicesNursesScale

Identifiers

PMID39135197
PMCPMC11321183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.