ArticleBMC health services research2024
Reducing sickness absence: a work environment intervention in Norwegian hospitals.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh rates of sickness absence is a challenge within the healthcare sector, highlighting the need for effective interventions. Despite this, limited research has been conducted on the impact of such interventions within the healthcare context. This study evaluates an intervention aimed at improving the work environment influences sickness absence rates in Norwegian hospital units. The intervention is a comprehensive framework for discovering and tailoring solutions to each units' specific needs, with a focus on employee involvement and collaboration between leader, union representatives and safety delegates.
methodsWe employed two methodological approaches. Method 1 involved using HR-registered sickness absence data to track changes in sickness absence across all intervention units and matched control groups over a three-year period. In Method 2, we used a pre- and post-survey design in 14 intervention units, focusing on employees' job satisfaction and self-reported health.
resultsThe results of the intervention were mixed. There was a significant decrease in total sickness absence in the intervention units the first year after the intervention, and a significant decrease in long-term sickness absence both in the first and second year after the intervention, measured with HR registries. However, we did not see a significant larger decrease in total sickness absence in the intervention units compared to the control units and only partial support for a larger decrease in long-term absence in the intervention units. In the subsample of units that also participated in the survey, we observed significant improvements in employee job satisfaction post intervention.
conclusionsThere is a need for research on effective interventions to reduce sickness absence in the healthcare sector. "Where the shoe pinches" provides a potential methodological framework for reducing sickness absence by addressing challenges in the work environment, however with uncertain results. Further exploration is warranted to refine strategies for effectively managing sickness absence within healthcare organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.