Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135174›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024

Impact of cerebral protection on observed versus predicted in-hospital stroke in a high stroke risk TAVR cohort.

Erez Marcusohn, Ragavie Manoragavan, Stephen Fremes, Christopher Tarola, Janarthanan Sathananthan, Israel M Barabash, Ady Orbach, Ayaaz K Sachedina, Sam Radhakrishnan, Harindra C Wijeysundera

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erez MarcusohnSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ragavie ManoragavanSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Stephen FremesTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Christopher TarolaTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Janarthanan SathananthanCentre for Cardiovascular Innovation, St. Paul's and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Israel M BarabashInterventional Cardiology Unit, Leviev Heart and Vascular Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ady OrbachCardiology Department, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Ayaaz K SachedinaFoothills Medical Centre, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sam RadhakrishnanSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Harindra C WijeysunderaSchulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. harindra.wijeysundera@sunnybrook.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite impressive improvements in the safety profile of Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the risk for peri-procedural stroke after TAVR has not declined substantially. In an effort to reduce periprocedural stroke, cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices have been utilized but have yet to demonstrate benefit in all-comers. There is a paucity of data supporting the utilization of CEP in TAVR patients with an anticipated high risk for peri-procedural stroke.

methodsThe Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement In-Hospital Stroke (TASK) score is a clinical risk tool for predicting the in-hospital stroke risk of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. This score was used to identify high-risk patients and calculate the expected in-hospital stroke risk. This was a single-centre cohort study in all consecutive TAVR patients who had placement of CEP. The observed versus expected ratio for peri-procedural stroke was calculated. To obtain 95% credible intervals, we used 1000 bootstrapped samples of the original cohort sample size without replacement and recalculated the TASK predicted scores.

resultsThe study included 103 patients. The median age was 83 (IQR 78,89). 63 were male (61.1%) and 45 (43.69%) had a history of previous Stroke or TIA. Two patients had an in-hospital stroke after TAVR (1.94%). The expected risk of in-hospital stroke based on the TASK score was 3.39% (95% CI 3.07-3.73). The observed versus expected ratio was 0.57 (95% CI 0.52-0.64).

conclusionIn this single-center study, we found that in patients undergoing TAVR with high stroke risk, CEP reduced the in-hospital stroke risk by 43% when compared with the risk-score predicted rate. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Embolic Protection DevicesStrokeTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansIntracranial EmbolismMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsAortic stenosisCerebral Embolic ProtectionStrokeTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID39135174
PMCPMC11321055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.