Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135161›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Assessment of the medical school learning environment at United Arab Emirates University.

Afaf Alblooshi, Nabtta Bashir, Sami Shaban, Saeeda AlMarzooqi, Abdul-Kader Souid, Krisztina Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Afaf AlblooshiDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS), United Arab Emirates (UAE) University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE. afaf.alblooshi@uaeu.ac.ae.
Nabtta BashirDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS), United Arab Emirates (UAE) University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Sami ShabanDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS), United Arab Emirates (UAE) University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Saeeda AlMarzooqiDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS), United Arab Emirates (UAE) University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Abdul-Kader SouidDepartment of Pediatrics, United Arab Emirates (UAE) University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Krisztina FischerDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the article was to assess students' perception of the learning environment at the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University using the 'Medical School Learning Environment Survey' (MSLES). Evaluating the learning environment and working towards its improvement is crucial for the physical and mental well-being of medical students, as it contributes to fostering an optimal learning environment.

methodsStudents participated in four groups: Year-1 (pre-medical), Year-2 (pre-medical), Year-3/Year-4 (pre-clinical), and Year-5/Year-6 (clinical). MSLES data was collected from each group using an online survey tool (Qualtrics XM). Latent factor structures in the learning environment constructs were assessed using 'exploratory factor analysis'; and reliability was measured by Cronbach's alpha. Differences among groups were assessed by 'single factor ANOVA'.

resultsThree hundred seventy-seven (65%) of the 584 eligible students completed the survey. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors: (Genn J. AMEE Medical Education Guide 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education-a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001;23(4):337-44.) Learning experience (∝=0.71), (Maudsley RF. Role models and the learning environment: essential elements in effective medical education. Acad Med. 2001;76(5):432-4.) Student-student interaction (∝=0.69), (Gruppen LD, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Conceptualizing learning environments in the health professions. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):969-74.) Student-faculty interaction (∝=0.62), and (Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: A systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):947-52.) Academic support (∝=0.62). Students in Y3-Y6 rated the learning environment statistically significantly lower than that in Y1-Y2. Student-student interaction in Y2 was significantly lower than that in other years. Student-faculty interaction in Y1 was significantly higher than that in Y2. Academic support was significantly higher in Y1 than that in Y2-Y6.

conclusionThe MSLES revealed variabilities in learning domains across the years. Improvement efforts should foster student-student collaboration in Y2 and improve academic support approaches for Y2-6. These findings provide valuable insights for medical educators to enhance the medical school learning environment and foster an optimal learning environment in lifelong medical education.

Indexed as

LearningSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Arab EmiratesYoung AdultAcademic supportLearning experienceMSLEStudent-faculty interactionStudent-student interaction

Identifiers

PMID39135161
PMCPMC11321012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.