ArticleGenome biology2024
Prevalence of and gene regulatory constraints on transcriptional adaptation in single cells.
Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Signatures of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay but no evidence for transcriptional adaptation associated with protein-truncating variants in wild yeast diploids.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Mechanisms linking cytoplasmic decay of translation-defective mRNA to transcriptional adaptation.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Homoeolog expression in polyploid wheat mutants shows limited transcriptional compensation.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Genomic stop codon scanning reveals quantitative principles of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating synthetic biology to understand and engineer the heart, lung, blood, and sleep systems.Cell systems · 2025Review
- Electron microscopy reveals saturated fatty acid-induced membrane defects in AdipoR2-depleted cells.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.Research square · 2025Article
- Resolving the design principles that control post-natal vascular growth and scaling.Cell systems · 2025Article
- Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic DNA barcodes identify singlets in scRNA-seq datasets and evaluate doublet algorithms.Cell genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCells and tissues have a remarkable ability to adapt to genetic perturbations via a variety of molecular mechanisms. Nonsense-induced transcriptional compensation, a form of transcriptional adaptation, has recently emerged as one such mechanism, in which nonsense mutations in a gene trigger upregulation of related genes, possibly conferring robustness at cellular and organismal levels. However, beyond a handful of developmental contexts and curated sets of genes, no comprehensive genome-wide investigation of this behavior has been undertaken for mammalian cell types and conditions. How the regulatory-level effects of inherently stochastic compensatory gene networks contribute to phenotypic penetrance in single cells remains unclear.
resultsWe analyze existing bulk and single-cell transcriptomic datasets to uncover the prevalence of transcriptional adaptation in mammalian systems across diverse contexts and cell types. We perform regulon gene expression analyses of transcription factor target sets in both bulk and pooled single-cell genetic perturbation datasets. Our results reveal greater robustness in expression of regulons of transcription factors exhibiting transcriptional adaptation compared to those of transcription factors that do not. Stochastic mathematical modeling of minimal compensatory gene networks qualitatively recapitulates several aspects of transcriptional adaptation, including paralog upregulation and robustness to mutation. Combined with machine learning analysis of network features of interest, our framework offers potential explanations for which regulatory steps are most important for transcriptional adaptation.
conclusionsOur integrative approach identifies several putative hits-genes demonstrating possible transcriptional adaptation-to follow-up on experimentally and provides a formal quantitative framework to test and refine models of transcriptional adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.