Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135102›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Prevalence of and gene regulatory constraints on transcriptional adaptation in single cells.

Ian A Mellis, Madeline E Melzer, Nicholas Bodkin, Yogesh Goyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ian A MellisDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. im2613@cumc.columbia.edu.
Madeline E MelzerDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nicholas BodkinDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yogesh GoyalDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. yogesh.goyal@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3502-6465

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM144295 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ALAN R HAUSER · 2022 to 2026
$9.1M
Physical Genomics and Engineering Training ProgramT32GM142604 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BACKMAN, VADIM · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM142604NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCells and tissues have a remarkable ability to adapt to genetic perturbations via a variety of molecular mechanisms. Nonsense-induced transcriptional compensation, a form of transcriptional adaptation, has recently emerged as one such mechanism, in which nonsense mutations in a gene trigger upregulation of related genes, possibly conferring robustness at cellular and organismal levels. However, beyond a handful of developmental contexts and curated sets of genes, no comprehensive genome-wide investigation of this behavior has been undertaken for mammalian cell types and conditions. How the regulatory-level effects of inherently stochastic compensatory gene networks contribute to phenotypic penetrance in single cells remains unclear.

resultsWe analyze existing bulk and single-cell transcriptomic datasets to uncover the prevalence of transcriptional adaptation in mammalian systems across diverse contexts and cell types. We perform regulon gene expression analyses of transcription factor target sets in both bulk and pooled single-cell genetic perturbation datasets. Our results reveal greater robustness in expression of regulons of transcription factors exhibiting transcriptional adaptation compared to those of transcription factors that do not. Stochastic mathematical modeling of minimal compensatory gene networks qualitatively recapitulates several aspects of transcriptional adaptation, including paralog upregulation and robustness to mutation. Combined with machine learning analysis of network features of interest, our framework offers potential explanations for which regulatory steps are most important for transcriptional adaptation.

conclusionsOur integrative approach identifies several putative hits-genes demonstrating possible transcriptional adaptation-to follow-up on experimentally and provides a formal quantitative framework to test and refine models of transcriptional adaptation.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscription FactorsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansRegulonTranscription, GeneticTranscriptomeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID39135102
PMCPMC11320884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.