Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135073›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2024

Tailoring biomaterials for vaccine delivery.

Yanling Zhuo, Huanxuan Zeng, Chunyu Su, Qizhuang Lv, Tianyin Cheng, Lanjie Lei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Developing Biomaterial-Based mRNA Delivery System for Lung Disease Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Evaluation of the transmission-blocking potential ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanling Zhuo *College of Intelligent Agriculture, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, 537000, China.
Huanxuan Zeng *The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325200, China.
Chunyu SuCollege of Intelligent Agriculture, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, 537000, China.
Qizhuang LvCollege of Intelligent Agriculture, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, 537000, China. lvqizhuang062@163.com.
Tianyin ChengCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, China. hn5368@163.com.
Lanjie LeiKey Laboratory of Artificial Organs and Computational Medicine in Zhejiang Province, Institute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310015, China. leilanjie1988@163.com.

Funding

Zhejiang Shuren University research project 2023R053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials are substances that can be injected, implanted, or applied to the surface of tissues in biomedical applications and have the ability to interact with biological systems to initiate therapeutic responses. Biomaterial-based vaccine delivery systems possess robust packaging capabilities, enabling sustained and localized drug release at the target site. Throughout the vaccine delivery process, they can contribute to protecting, stabilizing, and guiding the immunogen while also serving as adjuvants to enhance vaccine efficacy. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the contributions of biomaterials to the advancement of vaccine development. We begin by categorizing biomaterial types and properties, detailing their reprocessing strategies, and exploring several common delivery systems, such as polymeric nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, hydrogels, and microneedles. Additionally, we investigated how the physicochemical properties and delivery routes of biomaterials influence immune responses. Notably, we delve into the design considerations of biomaterials as vaccine adjuvants, showcasing their application in vaccine development for cancer, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, influenza, corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), tuberculosis, malaria, and hepatitis B. Throughout this review, we highlight successful instances where biomaterials have enhanced vaccine efficacy and discuss the limitations and future directions of biomaterials in vaccine delivery and immunotherapy. This review aims to offer researchers a comprehensive understanding of the application of biomaterials in vaccine development and stimulate further progress in related fields.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsVaccinesAdjuvants, VaccineAnimalsCOVID-19HumansHydrogelsNanoparticlesVaccine DevelopmentAdjuvants, VaccineBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsVaccinesBiomaterialsDrug deliveryVaccine adjuvantVaccine delivery

Identifiers

PMID39135073
PMCPMC11321069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.