Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135066›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2024

The effectiveness of a school-based protocol for environmental cleaning and disinfection during a pandemic: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Peggy Pui-Lai Or, Patricia Tai-Yin Ching

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peggy Pui-Lai OrDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China. peggyor@yahoo.com.
Patricia Tai-Yin ChingWHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, The School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince no specific environmental cleaning instructions and methods have been developed for schools to tackle pandemics, and cleaning methods, this study aims to investigate the feasibility of a new effective school cleaning protocol in reducing the environmental contamination in kindergarten and primary school settings.

methodsThis study implemented a cluster randomized controlled trial with three-arms, namely two intervention arms - groups A and B, and one control arm - group C. The first intervention arm included the cleaning staff who would participate in an educational workshop and be equipped with disposable wipes, while the second arm, group B, participated in the educational workshop only. The third arm, group C, received no treatments.

results1080 sample points were collected from pre-determined sites in the study within the 6 schools. At the 2-week follow-up post-intervention assessment, all sites were found to be clean for group A that used disposable wipes, while group B, without disposable wipes, were found to have left more sites contaminated. Staphylococcus aureus was found in the sites cleaned by group C.

conclusionBased on the findings in this pilot study, a further study at a larger scale focusing on the education program with enhancement and use of the cleaning protocol can be conducted to train cleaning staff for effective environmental cleaning in a school setting.

Indexed as

DisinfectionSchoolsChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPilot ProjectsStaphylococcus aureusCleaning methodCleaning staffDisposable wipesFluorescent markSchool health

Identifiers

PMID39135066
PMCPMC11321080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.