Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135050›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Systems thinking for local food environments: a participatory approach identifying leverage points and actions for healthy and sustainable transformations.

Tamika M Wopereis, Coosje Dijkstra, Joline J Wierda, Frédérique C Rongen, Maartje P Poelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Systems Science in Nutrition and Dietetics Research: A Practical Lens for Applying Systems Approaches in Research.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sustainable diets: where from and where to?Journal of nutritional science · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamika M WopereisChair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1623-3857
Coosje DijkstraDepartment of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joline J WierdaChair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.
Frédérique C RongenChair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.
Maartje P PoelmanChair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands. maartje.poelman@wur.nl.

Funding

Regio Deal Foodvalley 162135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent local food environments encourage poor diets, posing a significant threat to public and planetary health. Acknowledging and addressing its inherent complexity is vital to making meaningful improvements to the food environment. Using a participatory approach with local stakeholders, this study aims to gain insight into the factors and mechanisms underlying the local food environment and to identify leverage points and system-based actions to foster healthy and sustainable local food environments.

methodsA systems-thinking approach was used in a Dutch municipality in 2022. Two group model building (GMB) workshops were held with community stakeholders (e.g. local policymakers, retailers and residents). During the first workshop (June 2022), factors and mechanisms influencing the local food environment were identified and visualized through a causal loop diagram (CLD). During the second workshop, leverage points and system-based actions to improve food environments were identified by the stakeholders. Four months after (October 2022), an action-implementation meeting was organized to stimulate the implementation of selected actions. Progress was monitored through brief telephone interviews 6 and 12 months after the second workshop.

resultsThe CLD visualises the factors and mechanisms influencing the local food environment from the point of view of the community stakeholders. The CLD consists of 46 factors shaping the local food environment, which were categorized into four identified subsystems: societal factors, individual, socio-economic factors, commercial factors and political factors. Eight leverage points were identified within the CLD, for example, 'lobby from food industry', 'governmental food policies' and 'e-commerce and platform economy'. Stakeholders formulated 20 actions targeting the identified leverage points. During the action-implementation meeting, long-term plans were created for five actions. After 1 year, only one participant (policy advisory role) remained actively engaged in three of these actions.

conclusionsThis study yields insight into the numerous factors and mechanisms underlying the local food environment and identified system-based actions as perceived by local stakeholders to improve this food environment locally. The CLD offers stakeholders valuable insights on employing a systems approach when enhancing food environments. More research is necessary, especially into the long-term processes and effects of implementing system-oriented actions to improve local food environments.

Indexed as

Food SupplySystems AnalysisCommerceCommunity ParticipationDietDiet, HealthyEnvironmentFoodHumansNetherlandsNutrition PolicyPublic HealthStakeholder ParticipationSustainable DevelopmentComplexGroup model buildingHealthLocal food environmentSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID39135050
PMCPMC11318250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.