Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135033›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Awareness, support, and opinions of healthy food and drink policies: a survey of staff and visitors in New Zealand healthcare organisations.

Sarah Gerritsen, Magda Rosin, Lisa Te Morenga, Yannan Jiang, Bruce Kidd, Stephanie Shen, Elaine Umali, Sally Mackay, Cliona Ni Mhurchu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah GerritsenSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. s.gerritsen@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-5023
Magda RosinSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre 1142, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-3539
Lisa Te MorengaResearch Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-0091
Yannan JiangNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-9164
Bruce KiddNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-4790
Stephanie ShenNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Elaine UmaliNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sally MackaySchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre 1142, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-6738
Cliona Ni MhurchuNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-9167

Funding

Healthier Lives National Science Challenge PI: Cliona Ni MhurchuRoyal Society of New Zealand Te Aparangi Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (MAU1803)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2016, a voluntary National Healthy Food and Drink Policy (hereafter, "the Policy") was released to encourage public hospitals in New Zealand to provide food and drink options in line with national dietary guidelines. Five years later, eight (of 20) organisations had adopted it, with several preferring to retain or update their own institutional-level version. This study assessed staff and visitors' awareness and support for and against the Policy, and collected feedback on perceived food environment changes since implementation of the Policy.

methodsCross-sectional electronic and paper-based survey conducted from June 2021 to August 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to present quantitative findings. Free-text responses were analysed following a general inductive approach. Qualitative and quantitative findings were compared by level of implementation of the Policy, and by ethnicity and financial security of participants.

resultsData were collected from 2,526 staff and 261 visitors in 19 healthcare organisations. 80% of staff and 56% of visitors were aware of the Policy. Both staff and visitors generally supported the Policy, irrespective of whether they were aware of it or not, with most agreeing that "Hospitals should be good role models." Among staff who opposed the Policy, the most common reason for doing so was freedom of choice. The Policy had a greater impact, positive and negative, on Māori and Pacific staff, due to more frequent purchasing onsite. Most staff noticed differences in the food and drinks available since Policy implementation. There was positive feedback about the variety of options available in some hospitals, but overall 40% of free text comments mentioned limited choice. 74% of staff reported that food and drinks were more expensive. Low-income staff/visitors and shift workers were particularly impacted by reduced choice and higher prices for healthy options.

conclusionsThe Policy led to notable changes in the healthiness of foods and drinks available in NZ hospitals but this was accompanied by a perception of reduced value and choice. While generally well supported, the findings indicate opportunities to improve implementation of food and drink policies (e.g. providing more healthy food choices, better engagement with staff, and keeping prices of healthy options low) and confirm that the Policy could be expanded to other public workplaces.

Indexed as

Nutrition PolicyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesEquityEvaluationFood policyFood servicesHealthcareHealthy food availabilityHospitalSurveyWorkplace health

Identifiers

PMID39135033
PMCPMC11318292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.