ArticleBMC medical genomics2024
Exploring the prognostic landscape of oral squamous cell carcinoma through mitochondrial damage-related genes.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Exploring the prognostic landscape of oral squamous cell carcinoma through mitochondrial damage-related genes.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the most prevalent form of oral cancer, poses significant challenges to the medical community due to its high recurrence rate and low survival rate. Mitochondrial Damage-Related Genes (MDGs) have been closely associated with the occurrence, metastasis, and progression of OSCC. Consequently, we constructed a prognostic model for OSCC based on MDGs and identified potential mitochondrial damage-related biomarkers. Gene expression profiles and relevant clinical information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differential analysis was conducted to identify MDGs associated with OSCC. COX analysis was employed to screen seven prognosis-related MDGs and build a prognostic prediction model for OSCC. Cases were categorized into low-risk or high-risk groups based on the optimal risk score threshold. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis revealed significant survival differences (P < 0.05). Additionally, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for patient survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 0.687, 0.704, and 0.70, respectively, indicating a high long-term predictive accuracy of the prognostic model. To enhance predictive accuracy, age, gender, risk score, and TN staging were incorporated into a nomogram and verified using calibration curves. Risk scoring based on MDGs was identified as a potential independent prognostic biomarker. Furthermore, BID and SLC25A20 were identified as two potential independent mitochondrial damage-related prognostic biomarkers, offering new therapeutic targets for OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.