ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
An effective no-reference image quality index prediction with a hybrid Artificial Intelligence approach for denoised MRI images.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust image quality evaluation in optical coherence tomography of skin using global, region-independent metrics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A dual self-attentive transformer U-Net model for precise pancreatic segmentation and fat fraction estimation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- ROQUS: a retinal OCT quality and usability score.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- A Fundamental Study on the Removal of Vascular Pulsation Artifacts Using U-Net-Based Deep Neural Network.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the quantity and significance of digital pictures in the medical industry continue to increase, Image Quality Assessment (IQA) has recently become a prevalent subject in the research community. Due to the wide range of distortions that Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) can experience and the wide variety of information they contain, No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) has always been a challenging study issue. In an attempt to address this issue, a novel hybrid Artificial Intelligence (AI) is proposed to analyze NR-IQ in massive MRI data. First, the features from the denoised MRI images are extracted using the gray level run length matrix (GLRLM) and EfficientNet B7 algorithm. Next, the Multi-Objective Reptile Search Algorithm (MRSA) was proposed for optimal feature vector selection. Then, the Self-evolving Deep Belief Fuzzy Neural network (SDBFN) algorithm was proposed for the effective NR-IQ analysis. The implementation of this research is executed using MATLAB software. The simulation results are compared with the various conventional methods in terms of correlation coefficient (PLCC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Spearman Rank Order Correlation Coefficient (SROCC) and Kendall Rank Order Correlation Coefficient (KROCC), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). In addition, our proposed approach yielded a quality number approximately we achieved significant 20% improvement than existing methods, with the PLCC parameter showing a notable increase compared to current techniques. Moreover, the RMSE number decreased by 12% when compared to existing methods. Graphical representations indicated mean MAE values of 0.02 for MRI knee dataset, 0.09 for MRI brain dataset, and 0.098 for MRI breast dataset, showcasing significantly lower MAE values compared to the baseline models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.