Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134975›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Implementation of WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment: knowledge and perceptions of health providers from Argentina.

Silvina Arrossi, Cecilia Straw, Victoria Sanchez Antelo, Melisa Paolino, Armando Baena, Mathilde Forestier, Maryluz Rol, Maribel Almonte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvina ArrossiCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad/Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. silviarrossi@cedes.org.
Cecilia StrawCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Victoria Sanchez AnteloCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad/Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Melisa PaolinoCentro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad/Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Armando BaenaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Mathilde ForestierInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Maryluz RolInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Maribel AlmonteDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on cervical cancer screening and treatment provide countries with evidence-based recommendations to accelerate disease elimination. However, evidence shows that health providers' adherence to screening guidelines is low. We conducted a study in Argentina to analyze health providers' knowledge and perceptions regarding the 2021 WHO Guidelines.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted based on individual, semi-structured interviews with health providers specializing in gynecology (n = 15). The themes explored were selected and analyzed using domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

resultsAlthough health providers perceive WHO as a reliable institution, they do not know the 2021 guidelines, its supporting evidence, and its elaboration process. Their clinical practice is mainly guided by local recommendations developed by national professional medical associations (PMAs). For interviewees, WHO guidelines should be disseminated through health authorities and national PMAs, mainly through in-service training. Health providers had a positive assessment regarding WHO Recommendation 1 (screen, triage, and treatment for women aged 30 + with HPV-testing every 5 to 10 years) and perceived a favorable climate for its implementation. HPV-testing followed by triage was considered a low-complexity practice, enabling a better detection of HPV, a better selection of the patients who will need diagnosis and treatment, and a more efficient use of health system resources. However, they suggested adapting this recommendation by removing screening interval beyond 5 years. WHO Recommendation 2 (screen-and-treat approach with HPV-testing for women aged 30 + every 5 to 10 years) was predominantly rejected by interviewees, was considered an algorithm that did not respond to women's needs, and was not adequate for the Argentinean context. Regarding the HPV-test modality, clinician-collected tests were the preferred mode. Health providers considered that HPV self-collection should be used primarily among socially vulnerable women to increase screening coverage.

conclusionWHO guidelines should be widely disseminated among health providers, especially in settings that could benefit from a screen-and-treat approach. Identifying areas of partnership and collaboration with PMAs in implementing WHO guidelines is essential.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth PersonnelUterine Cervical NeoplasmsWorld Health OrganizationAdultArgentinaAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPractice Guidelines as TopicQualitative ResearchAdoptionArgentinaDisseminationImplementationWHO cervical cancer guidelines

Identifiers

PMID39134975
PMCPMC11321033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.