Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134951›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

The extent of implementation and perceptions of maternity and social care professionals about two interprofessional programs for care for pregnant women: a mixed methods study.

Marijke J C Hendrix, Darie O A Daemers, Jeannette M A Osterhaus, Linda Quadvlieg, Marianne van den Hof-Boering, Esther I Feijen- de Jong, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marijke J C HendrixResearch Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands. marijke.hendrix@zuyd.nl.
Darie O A DaemersResearch Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jeannette M A OsterhausResearch Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Linda QuadvliegDepartment of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marianne van den Hof-BoeringDepartment of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Esther I Feijen- de JongDepartment of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marianne J NieuwenhuijzeResearch Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2018, the Dutch government initiated the Solid Start program to provide each child with the best start in life. Key program elements are a biopsychosocial perspective on pregnancy and children's development and stimulating local collaborations between social and health domains, with a specific focus on (future) families in vulnerable situations. Two programs for interprofessional collaboration between maternity and social care professionals to optimize care for pregnant women in vulnerable situations were developed and implemented, in Groningen in 2017 and in South Limburg in 2021. This paper describes the extent of implementation of these programs and the perceptions of involved professionals about determinants that influence program implementation.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study in 2021 and 2022 in two Dutch regions, Groningen and South Limburg. Questionnaires were sent to primary care midwives, hospital-based midwives, obstetricians (i.e. maternity care professionals), (coordinating) youth health care nurses and social workers (i.e. social care professionals), involved in the execution of the programs. Semi-structured interviews were held with involved professionals to enrich the quantitative data. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed using Fleuren's implementation model.

resultsThe findings of the questionnaire (n = 60) and interviews (n = 28) indicate that professionals in both regions are generally positive about the implemented programs. However, there was limited knowledge and use of the program in Groningen. Promoting factors for implementation were mentioned on the determinants for the innovation and the user. Maternity care professionals prefer a general, conversational way to identify vulnerabilities that connects to midwives' daily practice. Low-threshold, personal contact with clear agreements for referral and consultation between professionals contributes to implementation. Professionals agree that properly identifying vulnerabilities and referring women to appropriate care is an important task and contributes to better care. On the determinants of the organization, professionals indicate some preconditions for successful implementation, such as clearly described roles and responsibilities, interprofessional training, time and financial resources.

conclusionsAreas for improvement for the implementation of interprofessional collaboration between maternity care and social care focus mainly on determinants of the organization, which should be addressed both regionally and nationally. In addition, sustainable implementation requires continuous awareness of influencing factors and a process of evaluation, adaptation and support of the target group.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsAdultFemaleHumansMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyNetherlandsPregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchSocial WorkersSurveys and QuestionnairesImplementationInterprofessional collaborationMaternity carePregnant women in vulnerable situationsPreventionSocial careSocial maternity care

Identifiers

PMID39134951
PMCPMC11321193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.