ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Development and validation of a model predicting adrenal lipid-poor adenoma based on the minimum attenuation value from non-contrast CT: a dual-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe early differentiation of adrenal lipid-poor adenomas from non-adenomas is a crucial step in reducing excessive examinations and treatments. This study seeks to construct an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) predictive model utilizing the minimum attenuation values (minAVs) from non-contrast CT (NCCT) scans to identify lipid-poor adenomas. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective analysis encompassed clinical data, minAVs, CT histogram (CTh), mean attenuation values (meanAVs), and lesion diameter from patients with pathologically or clinically confirmed adrenal lipid-poor adenomas across two medical institutions, juxtaposed with non-adenomas. Variable selection transpired in Institution A (training set), with XGBoost models established based on minAVs and CTh separately. Institution B (validation set) corroborated the diagnostic efficacy of the two models. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curves, and Brier scores assessed the diagnostic performance and calibration of the models, with the Delong test gauging differences in the area under the curve (AUC) between models. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values elucidated and visualized the models.
resultsThe training set comprised 136 adrenal lipid-poor adenomas and 126 non-adenomas, while the validation set included 46 and 40 instances, respectively. In the training set, there were substantial inter-group differences in minAVs, CTh, meanAVs, diameter, and body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.05 for all). The AUC for the minAV and CTh models were 0.912 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.866-0.957) and 0.916 (95% CI: 0.873-0.958), respectively. Both models exhibited good calibration, with Brier scores of 0.141 and 0.136. In the validation set, the AUCs were 0.871 (95% CI: 0.792-0.951) and 0.878 (95% CI: 0.794-0.962), with Brier scores of 0.156 and 0.165, respectively. The Delong test revealed no statistically significant differences in AUC between the models (p > 0.05 for both). SHAP value analysis for the minAV model suggested that minAVs had the highest absolute weight (AW) and negative contribution.
conclusionThe XGBoost predictive model based on minAVs demonstrates effective discrimination between adrenal lipid-poor adenomas and non-adenomas. The minAV variable is easily obtainable, and its diagnostic performance is comparable to that of the CTh model. This provides a basis for patient diagnosis and treatment plan selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.