ArticleSpine deformity2024
Improving prediction of progression of idiopathic scoliosis based on curve size and skeletal maturity.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tell me your triradiate is closed without telling me it's closed: assessment of surrogate radiographic markers for prediction of triradiate closure.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Economic evaluation of school scoliosis screening in Gannan Tibetan autonomous prefecture, Gansu Province: a cost-utility analysis based on decision tree-Markov model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo define the risk of curve progression of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) to 35°, 40°, 45°, and 50° based on current curve magnitude and Sanders stage for boys and girls, using a large cohort of patients and encounters, to improve granularity and allow more accurate estimations to guide treatment.
methodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected scoliosis database. Generalized estimation equation logistic regression models estimated probabilities of curve progression to 35°, 40°, 45°, and 50° based on starting curve size and Sanders stage. Probabilities and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each combination of variables to each endpoint separately for boys and girls.
resultsA total of 309 patients (80% girls) were included. Starting curve size and Sanders stage were significant predictors for progression in both sexes (all P ≤ 0.04). Higher starting curve sizes and lower Sanders stages were associated with greater odds of progression. Risk of progression was still present even at higher Sanders stages.
conclusionIS curves follow a predictable pattern, having more risk for progression when curves are larger and Sanders stages are smaller. Risk of curve progression is a spectrum based on these factors, indicating some risk of progression exists even for many smaller curves with higher Sanders stages. The improved granularity of this analysis compared to prior efforts may be useful for counseling patients about the risks of curve progression to various curve size endpoints and may aid shared decision-making regarding treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OR CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Level III: retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39134890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.