ArticleMolecular neurobiology2025
Dihydroergotamine and Bromocriptine: Potential Drugs for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder and Alzheimer's Disease Comorbidity.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Virtual screening of drugs against multiple targets of Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by memory loss and cognitive impairment. Evidence shows that depression is a common co-occurrence in AD patients, and major depressive disorder (MDD) is considered a risk factor for AD. The crosstalk between the biological procedures related to the two disorders makes it very difficult to treat the comorbid conditions caused by them. Considering the common pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AD and MDD, antidepressant drugs may have beneficial therapeutic effects against their concurrence. In this study, we aimed to explore the potential drug candidates for the prevention and treatment of the comorbidity of AD and MDD. First, we screened the potential drugs for treating MDD by evaluating the distances of drug targets to MDD-related genes on the human protein-protein interaction network (PPIN) via a network-based algorithm. Then, the drugs were further screened to identify those that may be effective for AD treatment by analyzing their affinities with tau protein and Aβ42 peptide via molecular docking. Furthermore, the most stable binding modes were identified via molecular dynamics simulations, and the regulatory effects of drug candidates on genes involved in the pathogenesis of AD and MDD were analyzed. A total of 506 MDD-related genes were retrieved, and 831 drug candidates for MDD treatment were screened via the network-based approach. The results from molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations indicated dihydroergotamine had the lowest binding affinity with tau protein and bromocriptine could form the most stable binding mode with Aβ42 peptide. Further analyses found that both dihydroergotamine and bromocriptine could regulate the expression of genes involved in the pathogenesis of AD and/or MDD in the brain. The exact mechanisms of the two drugs in treating AD and MDD, as well as their comorbidity, are still unclear, and further exploration is needed to evaluate their roles and mechanisms, both in vitro and in vivo. This study revealed that dihydroergotamine and bromocriptine may be the potential drug candidates for the treatment of the comorbidity of AD and MDD, and the therapeutic effects may be achieved by inhibiting the accumulation and aggregation of Aβ42 and tau protein and regulating the expression of disease-related genes in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39134826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.