ArticleScientific reports2024
Higher genetically predicted triglyceride level increases the bladder cancer risk independent of LDL and HDL levels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of triglyceride combined with age-adjusted D-dimer in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Integration of gut microbiome and lipid metabolism reveals the anti-cancer effects of pentadecanoic acid on bladder cancer.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Tumor innervation and mitochondrial transfer in the cancer pathogenesis: perspectives on genitourinary malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The causal relationship between lipid levels and bladder cancer is still inconclusive currently. We aimed to reveal the causal relationship between triglycerides, HDL, and LDL and the risk of bladder cancer by univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of exposure (triglycerides: 441,016 samples; HDL: 403,943 samples; LDL: 440,546 samples) were obtained from UK Biobank. The Genetic variation related to bladder cancer included 1554 cases and 359,640 controls. Univariable and multivariable MR methods were conducted with subsequent analysis, and smoking was regarded as a confounder. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted-median method, Cochran's Q test, and MR-PRESSO were considered the main MR analysis and sensitivity analysis methods. Univariable MR analysis results suggested the triglycerides level (P = 0.011, OR = 1.001, 95% CI = 1.000-1.002) was causally associated with increased risk of bladder cancer. Multivariable MR results indicated that higher triglyceride levels could still increase the risk of bladder cancer after adjusting the effects of HDL, LDL, and smoking (P = 0.042, OR = 1.001, 95% CI = 1.000-1.002). Our findings supported that triglyceride level is causally associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer independent of LDL and HDL at the genetic level. Timely attention to changes in blood lipid levels might reduce the risk of bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.