ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Biometrics of complete human pregnancy recorded by wearable devices.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Dermatology.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Review
- The menstrual cycle through the lens of a wearable device: insights into physiology, sleep, and cycle variability.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Smart Bracelets Among Chinese Pregnant and Postpartum Women: Discrete Choice Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Benefit of the N-of-1 Approach Versus Aggregate Analysis in Tracking Individual Trajectories During Pregnancy: Comparison of Longitudinal Wearable Observational Studies.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- From virtual pregnancy to digital twin obstetrics: multimodal data integration for personalized prediction of pregnancy complications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Innovative digital twin framework for early risk detection and personalized perinatal healthcare.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Smart Ring in Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancing cardio-obstetric care through digital health technologies: A narrative review.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Temporal Trajectories in Sleep, Temperature Trends, Cardiorespiratory, and Activity Metrics Measured via Oura Ring During Pregnancy: Large-Scale Observational Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Observational
- Advances in biomonitoring technologies for women's health.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Adherence to digital pregnancy care - lessons learned from the SMART start feasibility study.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Daily changes in sleep stages and associated cardiovascular parameters during pregnancy: using a wearable device.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Circadian rhythm of heart rate and heart rate variability in pregnancy.npj women's health · 2025Article
- An interdisciplinary fetal neonatal neurology collaborative promotes integrative life-course brain health.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States, normal-risk pregnancies are monitored with the recommended average of 14 prenatal visits. Check-ins every few weeks are the standard of care. This low time resolution and reliance on subjective feedback instead of direct physiological measurement, could be augmented by remote monitoring. To date, continuous physiological measurements have not been characterized across all of pregnancy, so there is little basis of comparison to support the development of the specific monitoring capabilities. Wearables have been shown to enable the detection and prediction of acute illness, often faster than subjective symptom reporting. Wearables have also been used for years to monitor chronic conditions, such as continuous glucose monitors. Here we perform a retrospective analysis on multimodal wearable device data (Oura Ring) generated across pregnancy within 120 individuals. These data reveal clear trajectories of pregnancy from cycling to conception through postpartum recovery. We assessed individuals in whom pregnancy did not progress past the first trimester, and found associated deviations, corroborating that continuous monitoring adds new information that could support decision-making even in the early stages of pregnancy. By contrast, we did not find significant deviations between full-term pregnancies of people younger than 35 and of people with "advanced maternal age", suggesting that analysis of continuous data within individuals can augment risk assessment beyond standard population comparisons. Our findings demonstrate that low-cost, high-resolution monitoring at all stages of pregnancy in real-world settings is feasible and that many studies into specific demographics, risks, etc., could be carried out using this newer technology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.