ArticlePediatric research2025
Using weight-for-age as a screening tool for metabolic syndrome in apparently healthy adolescents.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lim Homeobox 8 Is Essential for Beta Adrenergic Stimulation of Thermogenesis in Human Adipocytes.Cells · 2026Article
- Long-term lipoprotein and lipid profiles and association with metabolic risk markers in youth with perinatally acquired HIV and matched controls: a 10-year comparative cohort study.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among adolescents necessitates a simple and easy-to-use screening tool. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple model based on age, sex, race, and weight-for-age or BMI-for-age to identify adolescents with MetS.
methodsA cross-sectional study of adolescents (aged 12-18 years) who participated in the American National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) was performed. Participants with pre-existing hypertension, diabetes or dyslipidemia were excluded. Data from 2005-2018 were randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Anthropometric, demographic data, and MetS criteria were extracted.
resultsThe training group included 1974 adolescents (52% boys, median age 15 years), and the validation group included 848 adolescents (50% boys, median age 14 years). Both weight- and BMI-for-age demonstrated good discrimination ability in the training group (AUC = 0.897 and 0.902, respectively), with no significant difference between them (p = 0.344). Multivariable models showed similar discrimination ability. Therefore, weight-for-age was chosen and using Youden's index, the 93rd weight-for-age percentile (SDS 1.5) was identified as the optimal cut-off value for MetS. Similar values were observed in the validation group.
conclusionsAmong adolescents aged 12-18 years, weight-for-age percentiles are an easy-to-use primary screening indicator for the presence of MetS. IMPACT: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adolescents is increasing. An early detection screening tool is required to prevent related adulthood morbidity. Screening adolescents for metabolic syndrome is challenging. This study suggests the use of weight-for-age as a single criterion for primary screening of adolescents aged 12-18. Using weight-for-age as a single predictor of metabolic syndrome is expected to increase screening rates compared to using BMI-for-age, due to its simplicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.