Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134732›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2024

Genital and Subjective Sexual Arousal in Androphilic Women and Gynephilic Men in Response to the Copulatory Movements of Different Animal Species.

Lucie Krejčová, Ondřej Vaníček, Martin Hůla, Kateřina Potyszová, Klára Bártová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucie KrejčováDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.krejcova@fhs.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-4074
Ondřej VaníčekDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5966-1047
Martin HůlaDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2796-1226
Kateřina PotyszováDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2599-5043
Klára BártováDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátková 2137/5, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4654-0411

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 20-03604SUniverzita Karlova v Praze UNCE 204056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has repeatedly shown marked differences in men's and women's sexual response patterns; genital response in men tends to be elicited by cues that correspond to their sexual preference (preferred gender), while women's genital response is less sensitive to gender cues and more sensitive to the presence and intensity of other sexual cues (e.g., sexual activities). We tested whether the cue of copulatory movement in a general sexual context elicited a genital response in androphilic women but not in gynephilic men. If so, women should react to stimuli depicting not only the non-preferred gender but also other animal species differing in phylogenetic distance to humans. We studied the genital and self-reported arousal of 30 gynephilic men and 28 androphilic women to two sexual videos depicting penetrative human sexual intercourse (female-male and female-female) and nine videos depicting animal copulation. Neither women nor men showed genital or subjective sexual arousal to non-human sexual stimuli. Moreover, both sexes demonstrated a highly cue-specific pattern of arousal. Our results suggest that copulatory movement displayed in non-human species is not a sexual cue that can elicit genital or subjective sexual arousal in humans.

Indexed as

CopulationCuesSexual ArousalAdultAnimalsCoitusFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCategory specificityGenital responseSex differencesSexual psychophysiologySexual stimuli

Identifiers

PMID39134732
PMCPMC11335800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.