Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134717›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

The integration of the intracorporeal triangular anastomotic technique in robotic distal gastrectomy: advancing patient safety and procedural simplicity.

Yuki Ushimaru, Takeshi Omori, Ryohei Kawabata, Kazuki Odagiri, Tomohira Takeoka, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Akihiro Kitagawa, Nobuyoshi Ohara, Hideo Tomihara, Sakae Maeda and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparative insights into perioperative performance and three-year survival outcomes.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuki UshimaruDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan. yuki.ushimaru@oici.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1096-0980
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Ryohei KawabataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuki OdagiriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohira TakeokaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro NishikawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Akihiro KitagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuyoshi OharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Hideo TomiharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Sakae MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsunobu ImasatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Shingo NouraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) with Billroth I (BI) reconstruction is predominantly performed due to its physiological congruence and simplicity. The Intracorporeal Triangular Anastomotic Technique (INTACT) aims to reduce ischemic areas compared to the conventional Delta-shaped anastomosis using the unique characteristics of robotic surgery to standardize procedures, thereby ensuring safe, simple, and reliable reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the INTACT in RDG with BI reconstruction, focusing on its robotic precision in minimizing ischemic zones and improving surgical reliability. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The posterior duodenal wall is dissected before reconstruction, and the hepatoduodenal ligament is severed to facilitate passive duodenal manipulation. A quarter-circumference incision is created centrally on the anterior wall of the duodenal stump to avoid excessive tension during anastomosis and to ensure an adequate anastomotic diameter. A small opening is established on the greater curvature of the remaining stomach, and the posterior walls of the stomach and duodenum are joined using a Linear stapler in the first fire. A V-shape is created, and two EndoWrist instruments (robotic first and fourth arms) are utilized to grip and extend the anastomosis diameter, completing the anastomosis with a shared hole closure using the Linear stapler. The robotic arms' features improve the physiological integrity and stability of the BI reconstruction.

resultsA total of 81 patients underwent RDG with INTACT from September 2020 to January 2024. The median age was 72 years (range: 31-91), with 49 males and 32 females. The median blood loss was 0 ml (range: 0-200 ml), and the median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range: 6-20 days). No cases required reanastomosis during surgery, and no postoperative anastomotic leakage, surgery-related reoperations, or anastomotic strictures were reported.

conclusionINTACT in RDG can be safely performed. The characteristics of the EndoWrist instruments helped in stabilizing the technique, making it a viable option in robotic-assisted surgeries.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalGastrectomyGastroenterostomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDuodenumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyBillroth I reconstructionDistal gastrectomyGastric cancerRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.