ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Premature Infants: Comparison of Echocardiogram and Angiogram Measurements.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expert consensus on bedside transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Association of low shunt burden from PDA and adverse outcomes in premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (TCPC) utilizing transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as the sole imaging guide could simplify care. This single-center study compares PDA dimensions obtained from the TTE and angiogram images of patients who underwent attempted TCPC at Stead Family Children's Hospital from 10/01/2019 to 10/31/2020. Blinded investigators measured these dimensions solely for this study and had no impact on clinical care. Also, a hypothetical Piccolo device size was chosen based on the TTE dimensions and another on the angiographic dimensions, and then the correlation was analyzed. Sixty-two patients underwent TCPC attempts. TTE tends to overestimate the PDA narrowest dimension and underestimate the PDA length and aortic end dimension. Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between the length and aortic diameter (R = 0.37 and 0.21, respectively). A modest correlation was observed for the smallest dimension without color Doppler (R = 0.57) and with color Doppler, which was utilized when needed (R = 0.6). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a smaller mean difference between the TTE and angiogram measurements of the narrowest diameter without color Doppler (0.4 mm) and with color Doppler (used as needed) (0.4 mm). However, the mean difference is larger for the aortic end (- 1.64 mm) and the length (- 1.73 mm). TTE accurately predicted the Piccolo device size in 43 (72%) patients and overestimated the size in 17 (28%) patients to the next size. Our findings should be verified with further studies, and additional development of protocols is needed to use TTE to guide TCPC without fluoroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39134677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.