Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134655›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis of proximal colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Fei Han, Yue Xu, Xiangyu Li, Zhaoxiang Song, Jinlin Xie, Jianning Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Power of MUC2 in Mucinous Adenocarcinomas.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fei HanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Yue XuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Xiangyu LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Zhaoxiang SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Jinlin XieDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Jianning YaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road of Erqi District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China. rjyy@zzu.edu.cn.

Funding

Health Commission of Henan Province YXKC2021055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a distinct subtype of colorectal cancer. Previous studies have confirmed the poor prognosis of rectal or left-sided colon MAC, while the prognosis and response to chemotherapy in proximal colon MAC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, response to chemotherapy, and risk prediction factors of proximal colon MAC. Patients with proximal colon MAC and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The analyzed variables included gender, age, smoking, drinking, chemotherapy, metastasis, pathological stage, and tumor size. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the impact of mucinous subtype and chemotherapy on OS. We conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine prognosis factors for proximal colon MAC and NMAC. A total of 284 cases of proximal colon MAC and 1384 cases of NMAC were included in the study. Compared to NMAC, proximal colon MAC was diagnosed at a younger age. The proportion of synchronous and metachronous metastasis was also higher, as well as the pathological stage and tumor size. Proximal colon MAC had a worse prognosis than NMAC, especially in stage 3. Moreover, the prognosis of proximal colon NMAC improved after chemotherapy, while MAC showed no improvement in prognosis after chemotherapy. Advanced age, N1 and N2 stage were independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in MAC. For proximal colon adenocarcinoma, the independent predictors of adverse outcomes included mucinous subtype, order age, N1 and N2 stages, and pathological stage 4. Proximal colon MAC had a worse prognosis compared to NMAC. Chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of proximal colon mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousColonic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesClinicopathological characteristicsMucinous adenocarcinomaPrognosisProximal colon

Identifiers

PMID39134655
PMCPMC11319726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.