Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134653›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025

Select black men are potential candidates for prostate hemi-ablation based on radical prostatectomy histopathology for intermediate-risk prostate cancer-a multicenter SEARCH cohort study.

Sriram Deivasigamani, Eric S Adams, Shannon Stock, Srinath Kotamarti, Denis Séguier, Tarek Taha, Lauren E Howard, Alireza Aminsharifi, Ghalib Jibara, Christopher L Amling and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sriram Deivasigamani *Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. sriram.deivasigamani@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1790-9558
Eric S Adams *Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2954-1973
Shannon StockDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.
Srinath KotamartiDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1392-9102
Denis SéguierDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-774X
Tarek TahaZiv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6688-920X
Lauren E HowardDivision of Urology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-4483
Alireza AminsharifiDepartment of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Ghalib JibaraDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher L AmlingOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
William J AronsonDepartment of Urology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-5362
Matthew R CooperbergDepartment of Urology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-6685
Christopher J KaneDepartment of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-2112
Martha K TerrisDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, Augusta University- Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-7270
Zachary KlaassenDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, Augusta University- Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-8916
Lourdes Guerrios-RiveraDepartment of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-5105
Stephen J FreedlandDivision of Urology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419
Thomas J PolascikDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3666-1372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IMPORTANCE AND

objectivePartial gland ablation (PGA) is increasingly popular as a treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa) to preserve functional outcomes while controlling their cancer. We aimed to determine the impact of race and clinical characteristics on the risk of upstaging (≥pT2c) and having adverse pathological outcomes including seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), extra prostatic extension (EPE) and lymph node invasion (LNI) at radical prostatectomy (RP) among men with IR disease eligible for PGA with hemi-ablation (HA).

designRetrospective analysis.

settingMulticenter. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASURES: We studied patients diagnosed with unilateral IR-PCa treated with RP between 1988 and 2020 at 9 different Veterans Affairs hospitals within the SEARCH cohort. We analyzed differences in clinicopathological characteristics and outcome variables (odds of ≥pT2c and SVI, EPE and LNI) by race using multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for covariates.

resultsAmong 3127 patients, 33% were African American (AA) men with unilateral IR-PCa undergoing RP. Compared to non-AA men, AA individuals were younger (61 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001), presented with a higher prostate specific antigen (PSA) category (≥10 ng/ml; 34 vs. 26%, p < 0.001), and had a lower clinical stage (p < 0.001). Among the 2,798 (89.5%) with ≥pT2c stage, AA men exhibited higher ≥ pT2c rates (93 vs. 89%, p < 0.001), primarily due to increased pT2c staging (64 vs. 57%), where upstaging beyond pT2 was lower than non-AA men (29 vs. 32%). On multivariable analysis, AA men were found to have higher odds of ≥pT2c (odds ratio [OR]: 1.39 CI, 1.02-1.88, p = 0.04), lower odds of EPE (OR: 0.73 CI, 0.58-0.91, p < 0.01) and no statistically significant associations with LNI (OR: 0.79 CI, 0.42-1.46, p = 0.45) and SVI (OR: 1 CI, 0.74-1.35, p = 0.99) compared to non-AA men. On multivariable analysis, clinical features associated with higher odds of ≥pT2c were pre-operative PSA ≥ 15 (OR = 2.07, P = 0.01) and higher number of positive cores (HPC) on biopsy (OR = 1.36, P < 0.001). Similarly, PSA ≥ 15, Gleason grade ≥3 and HPC on biopsy were associated with higher odds of SVI, EPE and LNI, respectively.

conclusionsIn men with IR-PCa undergoing RP, AA men demonstrated an overall higher likelihood of ≥pT2c with lower upstaging beyond pT2, lower likelihood of EPE and no significant difference in likelihood of SVI and LNI compared to non-AA men. These findings support select AA men to be potential candidates for PGA, such as HA. Clinical factors are predictive of higher pathological stage and adverse pathological outcomes at RP and could be considered when selecting candidates for PGA.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesBlack or African AmericanProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesWhiteProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.