ArticleCommunications biology2024
Predicting monoclonal antibody binding sequences from a sparse sampling of all possible sequences.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing monoclonal antibody diversity by integrating bulk sorting and machine learning.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Serologic biomarker discovery for differentiating Lyme disease from diseases with similar clinical symptoms using broad profiling of antibody binding.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Predicting monoclonal antibody binding sequences from a sparse sampling of all possible sequences.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Highly heterogenous humoral immune response in Lyme disease patients revealed by broad machine learning-assisted antibody binding profiling with random peptide arrays.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous work has shown that binding of target proteins to a sparse, unbiased sample of all possible peptide sequences is sufficient to train a machine learning model that can then predict, with statistically high accuracy, target binding to any possible peptide sequence of similar length. Here, highly sequence-specific molecular recognition is explored by measuring binding of 8 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with specific linear cognate epitopes to an array containing 121,715 near-random sequences about 10 residues in length. Network models trained on resulting sequence-binding values are used to predict the binding of each mAb to its cognate sequence and to an in silico generated one million random sequences. The model always ranks the binding of the cognate sequence in the top 100 sequences, and for 6 of the 8 mAbs, the cognate sequence ranks in the top ten. Practically, this approach has potential utility in selecting highly specific mAbs for therapeutics or diagnostics. More fundamentally, this demonstrates that very sparse random sampling of a large amino acid sequence spaces is sufficient to generate comprehensive models predictive of highly specific molecular recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.