Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134609›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Increased color preference through the introduction of luminance noise in chromatic stimuli.

Luis Carlos Pereira Monteiro, Felipe André da Costa Brito, Eliza Maria da Costa Brito Lacerda, Paulo Roney Kilpp Goulart, Letícia Miquilini, Marcelo Fernandes Costa, Rachel Coelho Ripardo, Dora Fix Ventura, Givago Silva Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis Carlos Pereira MonteiroInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Av. Perimetral, 2-224, Belém, 66077830, Brazil. luis.monteiro@icb.ufpa.br.
Felipe André da Costa BritoInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Av. Perimetral, 2-224, Belém, 66077830, Brazil.
Eliza Maria da Costa Brito LacerdaInstituto de Ciências E Tecnologia das Águas, Universidade Federal Do Oeste Do Pará, Santarém, Brazil.
Paulo Roney Kilpp GoulartNúcleo de Teoria E Pesquisa Do Comportamento, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Letícia MiquiliniNúcleo de Teoria E Pesquisa Do Comportamento, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Marcelo Fernandes CostaInstituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rachel Coelho RipardoNúcleo de Teoria E Pesquisa Do Comportamento, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Dora Fix VenturaInstituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Givago Silva SouzaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Do Pará, Av. Perimetral, 2-224, Belém, 66077830, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans exhibit consistent color preferences that are often described as a curvilinear pattern across hues. The recent literature posits that color preference is linked to the preference for objects or other entities associated with those colors. However, many studies examine this preference using isoluminant colors, which don't reflect the natural viewing experience typically influenced by different light intensities. The inclusion of random luminance levels (luminance noise) in chromatic stimuli may provide an initial step towards assessing color preference as it is presented in the real world. Employing mosaic stimuli, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of luminance noise on human color preference. Thirty normal trichromats engaged in a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, indicating their color preferences between presented pairs. The chromatic stimuli included saturated versions of 8 standard hues, presented in mosaics with varying diameters under different luminance noise conditions. Results indicated that the inclusion of luminance noise increased color preference across all hues, specifically under the high luminance noise range, while the curvilinear pattern remained unchanged. Finally, women exhibit a greater sensitivity to the presence of luminance noise than men, potentially due to differences between men and women in aesthetic evaluation strategies.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionPhotic StimulationAdultChoice BehaviorColorFemaleHumansLightMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39134609
PMCPMC11319817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.