ArticleScientific reports2024
Association between chemotherapy for surgically treated rectal cancer and second primary endometrial cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The risk and prognosis factors of second primary malignancies in hepatocellular carcinoma survivors.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of different treatment modalities for rectal cancer and second primary urinary system neoplasms, findings from SEER.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To examine the potential correlation between chemotherapy and the risk of individual of second primary endometrial cancer (SEC) in patients with rectal cancer (RC) and assess survival outcomes. The study employed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) as the primary data source, it encompasses a substantial cohort of patients diagnosed with RC between 1975 and 2018. This study involved a total of 30,847 individuals diagnosed with RC, of whom 168 individuals (5.45‰) experienced SEC. Among them, 107 patients (3.47‰) received chemotherapy treatment, while 61 patients (1.98‰) did not receive chemotherapy. The analysis of the overall occurrence of SEC revealed a significant association between SEC and chemotherapy treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed a significant association between chemotherapy treatment and an increased risk of developing SEC in RC patients. Upon implementation of a dynamic analysis on the variables of relative risk and standardized incidence ratios, the results revealed that the likelihood of SEC escalated in tandem with advancing age. The examination of patients who developed SEC after receiving and not receiving chemotherapy revealed no substantial disparities in the 10-year overall survival (OS) and (cancer-specific survival) CSS rates. The results were the same after propensity score matching. Nevertheless, a notable discrepancy emerged when comparing the OS and CSS rates at 10 years between patients afflicted with SEC subsequent to chemotherapy and those afflicted with primary endometrial cancer, and the result was the same situation in the no-chemotherapy group. The use of chemotherapy in RC patients has been associated with an increased probability of developing specific SEC. Therefore, it is imperative to prioritize efforts aimed at reducing chemotherapy-related SEC occurrences and improving the prognosis of affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.