ArticleBMJ open2024
Engagement of Peer Educators from India's National Adolescent Health Programme for the COVID-19 response activities: Qualitative findings from i-Saathiya study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic strained India's healthcare system and health workers unprecedentedly. PURPOSE: The extent of the contribution by peer educators (PEs) from India's National Adolescent Health Programme-Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK) to COVID-19 response activities remains uncertain necessitating an imperative investigation. Within the overarching objective of the 'i-Saathiya' study ('i' signifies implementation science and Saathiya represents PEs in Madhya Pradesh), a key focus was to understand the role of PEs recruited under RKSK during COVID-19 in two Indian states, namely Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. The study states differ in sociodemographic characteristics and peer education implementation models.
methodsIn-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with stakeholders (n=110, Maharashtra: 57; Madhya Pradesh: 53) engaged in the implementation of RKSK's peer education programme at state, district, block and village levels. Focus group discussions (FGDs) (n=16 adolescents, Maharashtra: 8; Madhya Pradesh: 8) were conducted with adolescents, part of the peer group of PEs (n=120 adolescents, Maharashtra: 66; Madhya Pradesh: 54). IDIs and FGDs were audio-recorded, translated, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Adopting inductive and deductive approaches, a data-driven open coding framework was developed for thematic analysis.
resultsThe PE recruited under RKSK took a central role that extended beyond their predefined responsibilities within the RKSK. They provided crucial support to healthcare workers in curbing the spread of COVID-19. Their diverse contributions, including COVID-19 pandemic response support, addressing community and adolescent needs, role in COVID-19 vaccination efforts, navigating access to the health system and facilitating health workers in the implementation of various national health programmes and campaigns during COVID-19.
conclusionThe findings underscore the potential of PEs in bolstering the health system. Despite their unpreparedness for the context (COVID-19), PEs demonstrated tenacity and adaptability, extending their roles beyond their predefined responsibilities. Recognising PEs through awards and incentives, skill courses and additional grades, can enhance their visibility, sustaining impactful work within RKSK and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.