Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39134436›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Reported community engagement in health equity research published in high-impact medical journals: a scoping review.

Priscilla Medeiros, Janavi Shetty, Luiza Lamaj, Jessie Cunningham, Susitha Wanigaratne, Astrid Guttmann, Eyal Cohen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Priscilla Medeiros *Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1050-6067
Janavi Shetty *Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Luiza LamajFaculty of Science, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessie CunninghamHealth Sciences Library, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susitha WanigaratneEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0840-9006
Astrid GuttmannEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8177-2253
Eyal CohenEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada eyal.cohen@sickkids.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0112-7188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess reported community engagement in the design and conduct of health equity-focused articles published in high-impact journals.

designScoping review follows guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. DATA SOURCES: We selected the three highest-ranked journals from the 'Medicine-General and Internal' category including the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) along with all journals under their family of subspecialty journals (JAMA Network, The Lancet Group and the NEJM Group). Ovid MEDLINE was searched between 1 January 2021 to 22 September 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included health equity-focused articles and assessed for the reporting of community engagement at each stage of the research process. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data from articles that met the inclusionary criteria. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa to measure the agreement between two independent reviewers. Disagreements were adjudicated by a third independent reviewer.

results7616 articles were screened, 626 (8.2%) met our inclusion criteria: 457 (3.8%) were published by the JAMA Network; 167 (2.4%) by The Lancet Group; and 2 (0.2%) by the NEJM group. Most articles were from USA (68.4%) and focused on adult populations (57.7%). The majority of the articles focused on the topic of race/ethnicity (n=176, 28.1%), socioeconomic status (n=114, 18.2%) or multiple equity topics (n=111, 17.7%). The use of community engagement approaches was reported in 97 (15.5%) articles, of which 13 articles (13.4%) reported engagement at all stages. The most common form of reported engagement was in the acknowledgement or additional contribution section (n=86, 88.7%).

conclusionsCommunity engagement is infrequently reported in health equity-focused research published in high-impact medical journals.

Indexed as

Health EquityPeriodicals as TopicCommunity ParticipationHumansJournal Impact FactorHealth EquityPUBLIC HEALTHReview

Identifiers

PMID39134436
PMCPMC11331902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.