ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025
Sexually transmitted infections and migration in Uganda: a population-based study.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMigration is associated with increased risk of HIV infection in Africa, but evidence about non-HIV sexually transmitted infection (STI) burden among African migrants is limited.
methodsWe used data from the Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevalence Study, a cross-sectional population-based study of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis, syphilis and herpes simplex virus type 2 prevalence in southern Uganda, to compare STI prevalence between adults aged 18 and 49 years with and without a recent history of migration. Migration status was determined using household census data, with a recent migration history defined as having moved into one's community of current residence within the last ~18 months. Unadjusted and adjusted modified Poisson regression models were used to compare individual STI prevalence risk by recent migration status with associations reported as adjusted prevalence risk ratios (adjPRRs) with 95% CIs. Adjusted models included participants' sex, age, community type, education, occupation and marital status.
resultsAmong 1825 participants, 358 (19.6%) had a recent migration history. Overall, migrants exhibited a significantly higher combined prevalence of curable STIs (gonorrhoea, chlamydia, high-titre syphilis (rapid plasma regain ≥1:8) and trichomoniasis) as compared with long-term residents (34.4% vs 24.2%; adjPRR=1.23; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.47). Significant differences in curable STI prevalence by migration status were concentrated among persons living with HIV (49.4% prevalence in migrants vs 32.6% in long-term residents; adjPRR=1.42; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.85) and among women (38.8% in migrants vs 27.8% in long-term residents; adjPRR=1.26; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.58). High-titre syphilis prevalence was especially elevated among male migrants (11.2% in migrants vs 4.9% in long-term residents; adjPRR=1.82; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.13).
conclusionsThe prevalence of non-HIV STIs is higher among migrants. Tailored outreach and service delivery approaches that address the needs of mobile populations are crucial for integrated HIV and STI epidemic control in Uganda to optimise resources and reduce transmission risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.