ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Inter- and Intrarater Agreement of CT Brain Calcification Scoring in Primary Familial Brain Calcification.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CT-based Volume Measurement of Brain Calcification Is Related to Clinical Symptoms and Disease Progression in Primary Familial Brain Calcification.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe total calcification score (TCS) is a visual rating scale to measure primary familial brain calcification (PFBC)-related calcification severity on CT. We investigated the inter- and intrarater agreement of a modified TCS. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients aged ≥18 years with PFBC or Fahr syndrome who visited the outpatient clinic of a Dutch academic hospital were included. The TCS was modified, for example, by adding hippocampal calcification, and ranged from 0 to 95 points. Fifteen raters evaluated all CTs, of whom 3 evaluated the CTs twice. Their entrustable professional activity (EPA) level ranged from II (medical student) to V (neuroradiologist). Agreement was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total score. Kendall's W and weighted Cohen κ were used to determine the inter- and intrarater agreement for individual locations, respectively.
resultsForty patients were included (mean age 60 years, 53% women). The median modified TCS was 34 (range 4-76). For all EPA levels, the interrater agreement of the modified TCS was excellent (ICC = 0.97 [95% CI 0.95-0.98]). The Kendall W values were good to excellent for commonly affected locations, but poor to moderate for less commonly affected locations for raters with lower levels of expertise. The intrarater agreement of the modified TCS was excellent. The Cohen κ of most locations were substantial to almost perfect.
conclusionsThe modified TCS can be used with excellent reproducibility of the overall amount of brain calcifications and with limited training, although for some individual calcification locations more expertise is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.