ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024
Five-year follow-up of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of an AI-based pathologic response assessment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Neurological and Cardiac Adverse Events in Cervical Cancer Treatment: A Case of Postoperative Sintilimab-Induced Encephalitis and Myocarditis.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- The role of immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Unraveling the complexity of PD-L1 assays: a descriptive review of the methodology, scoring, and practical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Pretreatment CT-Based Machine Learning Radiomics Model Predicts Response in Inoperable Stage III NSCLC Treated with Concurrent Radiochemotherapy Plus PD-1 Inhibitors.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy exhibits potential in treating resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previously, we have reported the 3-year clinical outcomes of this trial, implying the effectiveness and feasibility of neoadjuvant sintilimab monotherapy. However, the long-term prognosis of patients receiving neoadjuvant mono-immunotherapy has yet to be elucidated.
methodsFor patients with stage IA-IIIB NSCLC, two doses of sintilimab (200 mg) were administered intravenously in the neoadjuvant setting. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed in these updated results. The predictive role of specific biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy was also explored.
resultsWith a median follow-up of 61.0 months, 5-year DFS and OS rates of patients who underwent R0 resection were 65.7% and 80.4%, respectively. The 5-year DFS and OS rates of patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were 71.9% and 90.9%, respectively. The presence of PD-L1 positivity (tumor proportion score ≥1%) showed a tendency toward the promising prognosis (OS, HR, 0.143; 95% CI: 0.027 to 0.743), especially for those who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR). In addition, tumor mutation burden was positively correlated with a favorable prognosis. A total of 10 recurrences and 5 subsequent deaths were identified within the 5-year follow-up, with lung metastasis being the predominant.
conclusionsThese updated analyses were the first to unveil the 5-year survival benefits of neoadjuvant sintilimab monotherapy, implying the potential value of PD-1 inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.