Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133999›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing practice2024

Cross-cultural comparison of low back pain in the nursing workforce: A pilot study.

Andrea Gilchrist, Denisa Macková, Andrea Pokorná

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea GilchristDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7104-3030
Denisa MackováDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Andrea PokornáDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Union-NextGenerationEU LX22NPO5101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to analyse cross-cultural differences in the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and other back pain of general nurses in direct inpatient care in the Czech Republic (CZ) and Great Britain (GB).

methodsThe survey was used using an extended standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and self-created additional questions. The data were analysed with Stata 15 using a significance level of 0.05.

resultsThe data analysis was based on 1043 questionnaires. We identified statistically significant differences in the LBP prevalence between the respondents (CZ 93% and GB 85%) over a period of 12 months. Nurses in both countries stated a higher prevalence of LBP compared to pain in the neck, shoulders or upper back. LBP increases in relation to age, length of work experience, body mass index (BMI) and university education (BSc). Age, length of work experience, BMI and education (nursing college and master's degree) were confirmed as significant risks contributing to the increased prevalence of other back pain as well. Respondents reported a reduction in work performance, leisure activities and the need to change profession in relation to LBP.

conclusionThe results of the study confirm that LBP is a frequent occupational health issue in the general nurses working in direct inpatient care in both countries.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonLow Back PainAdultCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesPilot ProjectsPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomgeneral nursemusculoskeletal low back painprevalencepreventionrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39133999
PMCPMC11608927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.