Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133848›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Origins of Life: The Protein Folding Problem all over again?

Charles D Kocher, Ken A Dill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How Does Genetic Information Enable Life?Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Science of the gaps.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Protein folding: From physics-chemical rules and cellular machineries of protein quality control to AI solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles D KocherLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-5186
Ken A DillLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-2002

Funding

John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 62564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How did specific useful protein sequences arise from simpler molecules at the origin of life? This seemingly needle-in-a-haystack problem has remarkably close resemblance to the old Protein Folding Problem, for which the solution is now known from statistical physics. Based on the logic that Origins must have come only after there was an operative evolution mechanism-which selects on phenotype, not genotype-we give a perspective that proteins and their folding processes are likely to have been the primary driver of the early stages of the origin of life.

Indexed as

Origin of LifeProtein FoldingProteinsEvolution, MolecularProteinsdisorder-to-order transitionfoldcatsorigin of lifeProtein Folding Problem

Identifiers

PMID39133848
PMCPMC11348307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.