Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133759›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Utilizing mentorship education to promote a culturally responsive research training environment in the biomedical sciences.

Sarah Suiter, Angela Byars-Winston, Fátima Sancheznieto, Christine Pfund, Linda Sealy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah SuiterDepartment of Human & Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-5974
Angela Byars-WinstonDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Diversity Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Fátima SancheznietoCenter of the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research (CIMER), Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-8840
Christine PfundCenter of the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research (CIMER), Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-0288
Linda SealySchool of Medicine Basic Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7167-2654

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent and compelling need for systemic change to achieve diversity and inclusion goals in the biomedical sciences. Because faculty hold great influence in shaping research training environments, faculty development is a key aspect in building institutional capacity to create climates in which persons excluded because of their ethnicity or race (PEERs) can succeed. We present a mixed methods case study of one institution's efforts to improve mentorship of PEER doctoral students through mentorship education workshops for faculty. These workshops were one strategy among others intended to improve graduate trainees' experiences, and positively affect institutional climate with respect to racial and ethnic diversity. Surveys of 108 faculty mentors revealed that about 80% overall agreed or strongly agreed with the value of culturally responsive mentoring behaviors but about 63% overall agreed or strongly agreed that they were confident in their ability to enact those behaviors. Through a series of three focus groups, PEER doctoral students reported that they noticed mentors' efforts to address cultural diversity matters and identified some guidance for how to approach such topics. We discuss future directions and implications for using mentorship education to activate systemic change toward inclusive research training environments and promoting the value of mentorship within institutions.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCultural DiversityMentorsFacultyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMentoring

Identifiers

PMID39133759
PMCPMC11318922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.