Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133715›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Returning to work with long covid in the UK during lockdown and other COVID-19 restrictions: A qualitative study.

Clement Boutry, Priya Patel, Jain Holmes, Kathryn Radford, Charlotte E Bolton, Nikos Evangelou, Roshan das Nair, Richard Morriss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient and Professional Perspectives on Long COVID: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clement BoutrySchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6781-2201
Priya PatelNational Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration East Midland, University of Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Jain HolmesSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Kathryn RadfordSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Charlotte E BoltonNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nikos EvangelouSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-0672
Roshan das NairSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-7893
Richard MorrissSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few previous studies have considered the experiences of people with long covid returning to work beyond symptoms in terms of employer and other support factors. The aim of this research was to understand the experience of returning to work for those with long covid symptoms in contrast to the non-long covid group who had not experienced COVID-19 during the time restrictions were imposed to limit the spread of COVID-19 infection. Twenty-one participants with long covid and 13 participants who had not had COVID-19 were interviewed. Themes were identified from transcripts using framework analysis. Participants with long covid experienced difficulties returning to work, particularly from fatigue, cognitive symptoms and breathlessness. Symptoms were heterogeneous and fluctuated in severity over time. A lack of understanding from colleagues and managers sometimes led to a premature return to work without adequate support, associated with further long covid relapse. Outside-of-work, support was salient for a successful return to work. The standard phased return offered by employers may be too short and rigid for some people with long covid. They may benefit from a tailored intervention to support a return to work that targets symptom management, and engages with work colleagues, managers, and family members.

Indexed as

COVID-19Qualitative ResearchReturn to WorkSARS-CoV-2AdultFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39133715
PMCPMC11318866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.