Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133660›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality rehabilitation in stroke patients with sensory-motor and proprioception upper limb deficit: A study protocol.

Sara Ventura, Alessia Tessari, Sara Castaldini, Elisabetta Magni, Andrea Turolla, Rosa Baños, Giada Lullini

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06881680 (Effects of Virtual Reality Features on Upper Limb Motor Function in Post-stroke Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06881680 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Virtual Reality Features on Upper Limb Motor Function in Post-stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsStrokeArmsvirtual reality (VR) head mounted display
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara VenturaInstituto Polibienestar, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Alessia TessariDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6616-2454
Sara CastaldiniUOC di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuro-riabilitazione, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Azienda USL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elisabetta MagniUOC di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuro-riabilitazione, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Azienda USL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea TurollaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences-DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rosa BañosInstituto Polibienestar, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-7665
Giada LulliniUOC di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuro-riabilitazione, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Azienda USL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStroke is the second leading cause of death in Europe. In the case of stroke survival (almost 70%), only 25% of patients recover completely, while the remaining 75% will undergo a rehabilitation phase that varying from months to years. The primary outcomes of a stroke involve motor impairment in the upper limbs, resulting in a partial or complete inability to move the limb on the right or left side, depending on the affected hemisphere. Furthermore, the motor deficit distorts the proprioception of the body and the embodiment ability of the injured limb. This could be rehabilitated through the paradigm of body illusion that modulates the motor rehabilitation. The present protocol aims to investigate the effectiveness of a Virtual Reality system for sensorimotor and proprioception upper limb deficit compared to a traditional upper limb rehabilitation program.

methodThis study has a randomized and controlled design with control and experimental groups, and 4 measurement times: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and two follow-ups (at 6 and 12 months). The inclusion criteria are: (a) Being 18 to 85 years old, both males and females; (b) Suffering from ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke; (c) The stroke event must have occurred from two to eighteen months before recruitment; (d) Patients must have moderate to severe upper limb motor deficit, and the alteration of sensorimotor and proprioception abilities of the injury upper limb; (e) Patients must understand and sign the written consent for enrolment. The rehabilitation last four weeks with three sessions per week at Bellaria Hospital of Bologna (Italy). The VR protocol uses two types of technology: immersive and non-immersive, and the control group follow the traditional rehabilitation program.

Indexed as

ProprioceptionStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityVirtual RealityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39133660
PMCPMC11318908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.