ReviewDermatology practical & conceptual2024
Clinical and Dermoscopic Diagnosis of Actinic Keratosis.
Review in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Photodynamic Therapy on Mast Cell-Associated Inflammation and Angiogenesis in Actinic Keratosis.Cancers · 2026Article
- Clinical Clearance of Actinic Keratoses with Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Assessment of Treatment Response in Actinic Keratosis: A Clinically Oriented Multimodal Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- A U-Net model for epidermal segmentation in optical coherence tomography images of actinic keratosis.PloS one · 2026Article
- The State of the Art in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and Field Cancerization: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Confocal Microscopy Scores for Assessing Severity of Actinic Keratosis.Cancers · 2025Article
- Real-World Efficacy of Tirbanibulin in Actinic Keratosis Treatment: Expert Consensus and Clinical Insights.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.