ArticleIUCrJ2024
Phase quantification using deep neural network processing of XRD patterns.
Article in IUCrJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rust-accelerated powder X-ray diffraction simulation for high-throughput and machine-learning-driven materials science.Journal of applied crystallography · 2026Article
- Characterization and Antimicrobial Assessment of Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- GCN-Based Framework for Materials Screening and Phase Identification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-enhanced X-ray diffraction analysis: towards real-time mineral phase identification and quantification.IUCrJ · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mineral identification and quantification are key to the understanding and, hence, the capacity to predict material properties. The method of choice for mineral quantification is powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), generally using a Rietveld refinement approach. However, a successful Rietveld refinement requires preliminary identification of the phases that make up the sample. This is generally carried out manually, and this task becomes extremely long or virtually impossible in the case of very large datasets such as those from synchrotron X-ray diffraction computed tomography. To circumvent this issue, this article proposes a novel neural network (NN) method for automating phase identification and quantification. An XRD pattern calculation code was used to generate large datasets of synthetic data that are used to train the NN. This approach offers significant advantages, including the ability to construct databases with a substantial number of XRD patterns and the introduction of extensive variability into these patterns. To enhance the performance of the NN, a specifically designed loss function for proportion inference was employed during the training process, offering improved efficiency and stability compared with traditional functions. The NN, trained exclusively with synthetic data, proved its ability to identify and quantify mineral phases on synthetic and real XRD patterns. Trained NN errors were equal to 0.5% for phase quantification on the synthetic test set, and 6% on the experimental data, in a system containing four phases of contrasting crystal structures (calcite, gibbsite, dolomite and hematite). The proposed method is freely available on GitHub and allows for major advances since it can be applied to any dataset, regardless of the mineral phases present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.