ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Automated Cerebrovascular Segmentation and Visualization of Intracranial Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is a non-contrast technique used to visualize neurovascular. However, manual reconstruction of the volume render (VR) by radiologists is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Deep learning-based (DL-based) vessel segmentation technology may provide intelligent automation workflow. To evaluate the image quality of DL vessel segmentation for automatically acquiring intracranial arteries in TOF-MRA. A total of 394 TOF-MRA scans were selected, which included cerebral vascular health, aneurysms, or stenoses. Both our proposed method and two state-of-the-art DL methods are evaluated on external datasets for generalization ability. For qualitative assessment, two experienced clinical radiologists evaluated the image quality of cerebrovascular diagnostic and visualization (scoring 0-5 as unacceptable to excellent) obtained by manual VR reconstruction or automatic convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentation. The proposed CNN outperforms the other two DL-based methods in clinical scoring on external datasets, and its visualization was evaluated by readers as having the appearance of the radiologists' manual reconstructions. Scoring of proposed CNN and VR of intracranial arteries demonstrated good to excellent agreement with no significant differences (median, 5.0 and 5.0, P ≥ 12) at healthy-type scans. All proposed CNN image quality were considered to have adequate diagnostic quality (median scores > 2). Quantitative analysis demonstrated a superior dice similarity coefficient of cerebrovascular overlap (training sets and validation sets; 0.947 and 0.927). Automatic cerebrovascular segmentation using DL is feasible and the image quality in terms of vessel integrity, collateral circulation and lesion morphology is comparable to expert manual VR without significant differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.