Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133384›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2024

Standardizing and Improving Primary Care-Based Electronic Developmental Screening for Young Children in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics.

Gladys Felix, Alexis Deavenport-Saman, Sophia Stavros, Niloofar Farboodi, Ramon Durazo-Arvizu, Joanna Garcia, Larry Yin, Mona Patel Gera

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consensus recommendations for usability and acceptability of mobile health autism screening tools.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gladys FelixDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS #76, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
Alexis Deavenport-SamanDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS #76, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA. adeavenport@chla.usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-7531
Sophia StavrosDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS #76, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
Niloofar FarboodiDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS #76, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
Ramon Durazo-ArvizuKeck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joanna GarciaInstitute of Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Larry YinDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS #76, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
Mona Patel GeraDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, MS #76, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMany barriers to implementation of developmental screening in primary care exist, especially for children from under-resourced communities. Developmental screening is vital to early detection of developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder, and early intervention (EI) referral. This study sought to examine whether implementation of a standardized clinical workflow using electronic screening tools improved both rates of developmental screening, and the number of children identified at risk for developmental delay, in a federally qualified health center (FQHC).

methodsA retrospective study was conducted at an academic-affiliated FQHC. Electronic versions of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3 (ASQ-3) and Modified Checklist in Autism for Toddlers Revised (M-CHAT-R) were implemented at well-child visits. New clinical workflow training on developmental screening and EI referral was provided. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact analyses were conducted.

resultsASQ-3 screening rates increased from 62.7 to 73.6% pre- to post-intervention. Post-intervention, there was a significant decrease in paper screens (p < .001), and a significant increase in the percentage of children with ASQ-3 results in the below cutoff range from 14.7 to 18.2% (p < .002). M-CHAT-R screening rates increased from 56.4 to 59.4% pre- to post-intervention. Post-intervention, there was a significant increase in electronic screens (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Implementation of electronic screening tools improved universal developmental screening in a FQHC. To decrease barriers in under-resourced communities, the use of electronic tools may decrease the rate of screening error seen with paper screening and have the potential to better identify children at risk for developmental delay.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareAutism Spectrum DisorderChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAutismChildrenDevelopmental delayElectronic developmental screeningFederally qualified health center

Identifiers

PMID39133384
PMCPMC11420335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.