ArticleHeart and vessels2025
Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on in vivo nailfold microcirculation in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on in vivo and ex vivo microcirculation, exercise capacity, and oxidative stress in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The study included patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS; n = 45; age, 69.0 ± 14.1 years) and heart failure (HF; n = 66; age, 77.3 ± 10.7 years) who underwent supervised CR during hospitalization. The control group comprised patients without CVD (NCVD; n = 20; age, 75.9 ± 11.2 years). In vivo microcirculatory observations using nailfold video capillary endoscopy at rest and during hyperemia, exercise capacity, and oxidative stress were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks after discharge. Baseline capillary densities were significantly lower in the ACS (5.0 ± 1.7 capillaries/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
39133315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.