Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39133311›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Perioperative and extended outcomes of patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair following cystectomy and ileal conduit.

Taseen F Haque, Alireza Ghoreifi, Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam, Masatomo Kaneko, David Ginsberg, Rene Sotelo, Inderbir Gill, Mihir Desai, Monish Aron, Anne Schuckman and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Taseen F HaqueUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alireza GhoreifiUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Farshad Sheybaee MoghaddamUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Masatomo KanekoUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David GinsbergUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rene SoteloUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Inderbir GillUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mihir DesaiUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Monish AronUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anne SchuckmanUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Siamak DaneshmandUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hooman DjaladatUrology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. hoomanj@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-3556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report perioperative and long-term postoperative outcomes of cystectomy patients with ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion undergoing parastomal hernia (PSH) repair.

methodWe reviewed patients who underwent cystectomy and IC diversion between 2003 and 2022 in our center. Baseline variables, including surgical approach of PSH repair and repair technique, were captured. Multivariable Cox regressionanalysis was performed to test for the associations between different variables and PSH recurrence.

resultsThirty-six patients with a median (IQR) age of 79 (73-82) years were included. The median time between cystectomy and PSH repair was 30 (14-49) months. Most PSH repairs (32/36, 89%) were performed electively, while 4 were due to small bowel obstruction. Hernia repairs were performed through open (n=25), robotic (10), and laparoscopic approaches (1). Surgical techniques included direct repair with mesh (20), direct repair without mesh (4), stoma relocation with mesh (5), and stomarelocation without mesh (7). The 90-day complication rate was 28%. In a median follow-up of 24 (7-47) months, 17 patients (47%) had a recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 9 (7-24) months. On multivariable analysis, 90-day complication following PSH repair was associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

conclusionsIn this report of one of the largest series of PSH repair in the Urology literature, 47% of patients had a recurrence following hernia repair with a median follow-up time of 2 years. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates when comparing repair technique or the use of open or minimally invasive approaches.

Indexed as

CystectomyHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaUrinary DiversionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHernia, VentralHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAbdominal herniaCystectomyHerniorrhaphySurgical meshUrinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID39133311
PMCPMC11319381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.