ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Device-Related Reoperations 8 Years Following Sacral Neuromodulation Implantation in Older Women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revision and Explantation After Permanent Sacral Neuromodulation for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to describe long-term device-related reoperations at 8 years following sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in women older than 65 years for the indications of overactive bladder (OAB), fecal incontinence (FI), and/or idiopathic urinary retention (UR).
methodsThe 2010-2019 Medicare 100% Outpatient Limited Dataset was used to identify women aged 65 years and older who underwent SNM to treat OAB, FI, and/or UR. The primary study outcome was any device-related reoperation within 8 years following initial implantable pulse generator (IPG) implantation defined as: IPG revision or removal; IPG replacement; or neuro-electrode revision or removal. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed to evaluate time to adverse event.
resultsThe cohort included 32,454 women with a mean age of 74 years. The most common indication for SNM was OAB (71%) followed by UI and FI (13%) and FI only (8%). Staged SNM procedures were performed more frequently (60%) than percutaneous nerve evaluation/full implants. The overall rate of device-related reoperations was 24% over 8 years: 12% of patients underwent removal or revision of the neuro-electrode, 11% underwent removal or revision of the IPG, and 13% underwent replacement of the IPG. The mean follow-up was 3.9 ± 2.4 years. The cumulative incidence of any device-related reoperations was 9.4% at 1 year, 20% at 3 years, and 43% at 8 years.
conclusionsIn the 8 years following SNM implantation, the rate of device-related reoperation among female Medicare beneficiaries was 43%, and staged implants were associated with a 17% lower likelihood of undergoing any device-related reoperations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39133310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.