ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Exploring the value of FAP-targeted PET/CT in differentiating breast cancer molecular subtypes: a preliminary study.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of liver fibrosis and tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Trial
- [Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of [¹⁸F]FAPI-42 and [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for lesion detection and uptake in prostate cancer across disease stages.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Comparison between [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of [Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Integrated [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-specific uptake ofBMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis prospective study aims to evaluate the value of [
methodsThe study consecutively recruited patients suspected of having breast cancer from a single center who were prospectively enrolled from July 2023 to May 2024 and underwent [
resultsFifty-three participants (mean age, 51 ± 11 years; 52 females) were evaluated. Breast cancer lesions with adverse prognostic factors showed higher tracer uptake. The five different molecular subtypes exhibited varying levels of uptake. The luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) subtypes had relatively low uptake, while the luminal B (HER2-positive), HER2-positive, and triple-negative subtypes had relatively high uptake. ROC analysis identified the max standardized uptake value (SUV
conclusionThe uptake of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
39133307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.