ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Improved allele-specific single-cell copy number estimation in low-coverage DNA-sequencing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CNVeil resolves haplotype-specific copy number and uncovers subclonal architecture hidden from total copy number profiling in single-cell cancer genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Integrative Modeling of Read Depth and B-Allele Frequency Improves Single-Cell Copy Number Calling from Targeted DNA Sequencing Panels.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Genome doubling as a dynamic driver of ovarian cancer evolution: insights from single-cell sequencing.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAdvances in whole-genome single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) have led to the development of numerous methods for detecting copy number aberrations (CNAs), a key driver of genetic heterogeneity in cancer. While most of these methods are limited to the inference of total copy number, some recent approaches now infer allele-specific CNAs using innovative techniques for estimating allele-frequencies in low coverage scDNA-seq data. However, these existing allele-specific methods are limited in their segmentation strategies, a crucial step in the CNA detection pipeline.
resultsWe present SEACON (Single-cell Estimation of Allele-specific COpy Numbers), an allele-specific copy number profiler for scDNA-seq data. SEACON uses a Gaussian Mixture Model to identify latent copy number states and breakpoints between contiguous segments across cells, filters the segments for high-quality breakpoints using an ensemble technique, and adopts several strategies for tolerating noisy read-depth and allele frequency measurements. Using a wide array of both real and simulated datasets, we show that SEACON derives accurate copy numbers and surpasses existing approaches under numerous experimental conditions, and identify its strengths and weaknesses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SEACON is implemented in Python and is freely available open-source from https://github.com/NabaviLab/SEACON and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12727008.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.