ArticleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)2025
Microsurgical Repair of Ventral Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Efficacy and Safety of Patch-Sealing Versus Suturing.
Article in Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Temporal and regional trends in the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Resolution of pachymeningeal enhancement is a radiographic marker for effective treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: patient series.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Acute subdural hematoma in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: illustrative case and review of the literature.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIn patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), microsurgical repair is recommended in Type 1 (ventral) dural leaks, when conservative measures fail. However, there is lacking consensus on the optimal surgical technique for permanent and safe closure of ventral leaks.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of surgically treated SIH patients with Type 1 leaks at our institution between 2013 and 2023. Patients were analyzed according to the type of surgical technique: (1) Microsurgical suture vs (2) extradural and intradural patching (sealing technique). End points were resolution of spinal longitudinal epidural cerebrospinal fluid collection (SLEC), change in brain SIH-Score (Bern-Score), headache resolution after 3 months, surgery time, complications, and reoperation rates.
resultsIn total, 85 (66% women) patients with consecutive SIH (mean age 47 ± 11 years) underwent transdural microsurgical repair. The leak was sutured in 53 (62%) patients (suture group) and patch-sealed in 32 (38%) patients (sealing group). We found no significant difference in the rates of residual SLEC and resolution of headache between suture and sealing groups (13% vs 22%, P = .238 and 89% vs 94%, P = .508). No changes were found in the postoperative Bern-Score between suture and sealing groups (1.4 [±1.6] vs 1.7 [±2.1] P = 1). Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in the sealing group than in the suture group (139 ± 48 vs 169 ± 51 minutes; P = .007). Ten patients of the suture and 3 of the sealing group had a complication (23% vs 9%, P = .212), whereas 6 patients of the suture and 2 patients of the sealing group required reoperation (11% vs 6%, P = .438).
conclusionMicrosurgical suturing and patch-sealing of ventral dural leaks in patients with SIH are equally effective. Sealing alone is a significantly faster technique, requiring less spinal cord manipulation and may therefore minimize the risk of surgical complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.