Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39132980›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2024

Incorporating Patient Values in Large Language Model Recommendations for Surrogate and Proxy Decisions.

Victoria J Nolan, Jeremy A Balch, Naveen P Baskaran, Benjamin Shickel, Philip A Efron, Gilbert R Upchurch, Azra Bihorac, Christopher J Tignanelli, Ray E Moseley, Tyler J Loftus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Victoria J NolanDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Jeremy A BalchDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Naveen P BaskaranDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Benjamin ShickelDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Philip A EfronDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Gilbert R UpchurchDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Azra BihoracDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Christopher J TignanelliDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN.
Ray E MoseleyCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Tyler J LoftusDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-5354-443

Funding

Molecular Biology in Burns and TraumaT32GM008721 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Philip A Efron · 1999 to 2026
$5.0M
Aligning Patient Acuity with Resource Intensity after Major SurgeryR01GM149657 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Tyler J Loftus · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
Aligning Patient Acuity with Intensity of Care after SurgeryK23GM140268 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LOFTUS, TYLER J · 2020 to 2023
$619k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM140268NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM149657NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurrogates, proxies, and clinicians making shared treatment decisions for patients who have lost decision-making capacity often fail to honor patients' wishes, due to stress, time pressures, misunderstanding patient values, and projecting personal biases. Advance directives intend to align care with patient values but are limited by low completion rates and application to only a subset of medical decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of large language models (LLMs) to incorporate patient values in supporting critical care clinical decision-making for incapacitated patients in a proof-of-concept study.

methodsWe simulated text-based scenarios for 50 decisionally incapacitated patients for whom a medical condition required imminent clinical decisions regarding specific interventions. For each patient, we also simulated five unique value profiles captured using alternative formats: numeric ranking questionnaires, text-based questionnaires, and free-text narratives. We used pre-trained generative LLMs for two tasks: 1) text extraction of the treatments under consideration and 2) prompt-based question-answering to generate a recommendation in response to the scenario information, extracted treatment, and patient value profiles. Model outputs were compared with adjudications by three domain experts who independently evaluated each scenario and decision. RESULTS AND

conclusionsAutomated extractions of the treatment in question were accurate for 88% (n = 44/50) of scenarios. LLM treatment recommendations received an average Likert score by the adjudicators of 3.92 of 5.00 (five being best) across all patients for being medically plausible and reasonable treatment recommendations, and 3.58 of 5.00 for reflecting the documented values of the patient. Scores were highest when patient values were captured as short, unstructured, and free-text narratives based on simulated patient profiles. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential for LLMs to function as support tools for surrogates, proxies, and clinicians aiming to honor the wishes and values of decisionally incapacitated patients.

Indexed as

ProxyAdvance DirectivesClinical Decision-MakingCritical CareDecision MakingHumansLanguageProof of Concept StudySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39132980
PMCPMC11321752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.